Fanboi Channel

Heroes Film 6 - WW คือ Origin Story ที่ทำรายได้สูงสุด แปะ แปะ

Last posted

Total of 1000 posts

131 Nameless Fanboi Posted ID:CPAO3kx8J

Telegraph: 1 out of 5 stars
The Guardian: 2 out of 5 stars
Hollywood Reporter: No rating, "Bottom Line: A chore to sit through"
Collider: D+, "Beyond Saving"
Rolling Stone: 2.5 out of 4
News.com: "The good news is Justice League is not as terrible as you feared. The bad news is it’s still a bloated, disjointed affair that makes little sense and a hash of one of the coolest superheroes."
The Globe: 2 out of 4 stars, "It's already time to disband the Justice League"
Uproxx: "‘Justice League’ Is A Drag And A Big Step Backwards For DC Movies"
Comicbook.com: 4 out of 5 stars
New York Daily News: '"Justice League' isn't super, but again shows power of Gal Gadot's Wonder Woman"
IGN: 7 out of 10, "Warner Bros. and DC Films had two major goals to achieve with Justice League. First, to cleanse the palette of those turned off by the relentlessly grim BvS; and second, to make viewers enjoy these superheroes enough to want to see further screen appearances by them. Justice League mostly succeeds in accomplishing those two key objectives, despite its sloppy execution. It’s messy and flawed but it still offers enough entertainment value (mostly thanks to its likable characters) to make it worthwhile."

Posts limit exceeded

Topic has reached maximum number of posts.

Please start a new topic.

Be Civil — "Be curious, not judgemental"

  • FAQs — คำถามที่ถามบ่อย (การใช้บอร์ด การแบน ฯลฯ)
  • Policy — เกณฑ์การใช้งานเว็บไซต์
  • Guidelines — ข้อแนะนำในการใช้งานเว็บไซต์
  • Deletion Request — แจ้งลบและเกณฑ์การลบข้อความ
  • Law Enforcement — แจ้งขอ IP address

All contents are responsibility of its posters.