>>738 Ok... for the main topic: erm... here is the thing. First, I have adjusted in my new novel but it's >>695, who didn't seem to care about my novel or my new narrative choice, instead he attacked and made a false claim right there, mentioning physics and scientific stuff and all, claiming that I'm still doing that same just like my past. If I did not try to fix my way of communication, I would gladly accept that claim. He drew physics and science into this mess, suggesting that I'm still with the narrative that dense and complex. Hence, in the past, it was either the first or the second side of Dunning Kruger Effect. Am I dumb and thinking that I am smart, or I'm capable but struggling to communicate with what I know.
You said Dunning Kruger Effect has nothing to do with this argument. The curse that I am having. Look how I communicate to people. Is it a problem? Yes! Am I trying to fix it? Yes! I am no Richard Feynman. I'm not a great explainer. I'm just Louis Forest. And look how I communicate. Look how I tried to fix shit.
Just ignore the sub topic, the hell with it. My strategy is not trying to confuse you with sub topics. I just answered and further explained the second side of Dunning Kruger Effect. It seems to be pointless to go deeper into it now, i think. Sub topic or not, it's about communication. The one that I'm having the same problem just any other specialist.
The point here should be: I have a problem, I'm trying my best to fix it. Did it improve? Or you want to talk about the past.
Am I making it clear now? Mr. Lost of Words. Oh dear...