So, what to do again? At first, I only come to imply that your statement is not logically right and with your additional claiming, it still doesn’t right since both of your additional statement doesn’t related to >>695statement because at first, the two group example is only ‘who can explained it simply’ and ‘who explained it technically right but don’t care whoever will get it’ but you argue that they claimed you to be in either ‘expert who underestimated themself’ and ‘low-abillity people who overestimated themself’. And then, you claimed that to be subset of those above.
Ah, yes.
I totally lost a word.
Who said that it’s okay to talk about sub topic while talking about main topic!
It’s not like that I don’t understand you, but instead, I feel lost a word like I’ve said.
You’re technically right but that’s logically wrong in debating.
Well, Your claiming about scientist is right. But that’s 2 sub topic needed to be explained.
1st, they’re a great scientific communicator. This one is right since they’re expert in this field.
2nd, they’re low-abillity communicator. This one is both right and wrong since scientific word is specific word used in specific field. In case that’s right, If they’re easy to understand in several time, how can it be specific word? And in case that’s wrong, it’s because different level of language Whether they’re going to communicate with non-expert or not is their own choice.
And from 1st sub topic, is it not common to talk with someone who’s in same field? If it’s me, I also sure prefer talking with someone who’s in same field since they’ll also know scientific word so there’s no need to adjust the word again( I’m sure it’s also waste of time if It’s me and I need to adjust the word so common people understand it easier and I would also rather leave the adjustment to others). But if it’s talking with non-expert, I sure that it’s better to talk with other about how to get through it smoothly.
I think it’s better to describe this as ‘common people use language level 1’ ‘officer use language level 2(-X)’ and ‘expert use level 3-X’ (level is how specific the word is and X is shown for which field the world is specific for). People usually use the word they’re simillar with. (As you said in above but this is still not related to the matter because the two group example didn’t care how highly your skill are but instead it care whether you can made communicate with target successful or not, leading to decide whether you’re in which group of two example group )
I sorry for taking too much time rearrange it to make smoothly but it’s not bad to have my time do critical thinking here